Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7657 13
Original file (NR7657 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

BC
_ Docket No: 07657-13
2 September 2014

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

Subj: REVIEW OF as OF RECORD FORMER

Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments
(2) Case summary
(3) Subject's naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a
former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the
general discharge issued on 12 May 1995, be upgraded to
honorable.

2. The Board, consisting of Mr. 4salman, Mr. Sproul, and Ms.
Tollefson, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice on 27 August 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material

considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval

records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
finds as follows:

a. Petitioner enlisted on 8 September 1988. He was not the
subject of any military disciplinary action. He was convicted
by a General District Court in Portsmouth, Virginia, of speeding
and failure to wear a seatbelt and was fined a total of $91. He
was recommended for administrative separation by reason of
failure to pass the Physical readiness Test (PRT) on three
occasions within a four year period and was discharged with a
general characterization of service on 12 May 1995.
CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action.

In this regard, the Board notes that Petitioner’s misconduct was
minor and did not warrant a general discharge. Accordingly, it
finds it to be in the interest of justice to grant his request.

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that
he was honorably discharged on 12 May 1995. :

b. That a copy of this report of proceedings be filed in his
record,

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6{c) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN BRIAN J. GEOR

Recorder Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulation, Section 723.6 (e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5497 13

    Original file (NR5497 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 SJN Docket No: 5497-13 10 July 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records. The Board, consisting of Mr. Clemmons, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. Marquez, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2436-13

    Original file (NR2436-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former officer of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board _ requesting, in effect, that her characterization of service - “Under other than honorable (OTH) conditions", narrative reason for separation, “homosexual conduct”, Separation Program Designator (SPD) “HRB”, and “RE-4” {not recommended for retention) reentry code, be changed per reference (b). It provides service Discharge Review Boards with the authority to grant...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7277-13

    Original file (NR7277-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Gattis, and Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 11 March 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Although Petitioner was properly discharged from the Marine Corps © as a result of his GCM sentence, he did request and was granted restoration to duty subject to six months of probation on 12 April 1950. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9677 14

    Original file (NR9677 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former commissioned officer of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his honorable discharge date of 31 January 2011, be changed to reflect 1 February 2011 and that his separation code “FBR” (expiration of term of service) be changed to “FGP” (interdepartmental transfer). The Board, consisting of Mr. Grover, Mr. Ivins, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7600 13

    Original file (NR7600 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Grover, and Mr. Midboe, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13 August 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ‘The Board particularly notes that he received the Good Conduct Medal and this was his only offense during more than three years of service, Moreover Petitioner’s commanding officer recommended that he...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5127 14

    Original file (NR5127 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    c. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active duty on 19 July 1995. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board concludes that Petitioner’s request warrants partial relief. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that on 31 January 1997, he received a “general discharge” vice discharge under other than honorable conditions.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5116 13

    Original file (NR5116 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7O1 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 SON Docket No: 5116-13 24 June 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: aa ss NAVAL RECORD OF PG Ref: {a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change in his bad conduct discharge (BCD) received on 24...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8359 13

    Original file (NR8359 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reentry code issued on 7 September 2011 be upgraded. The Board, consisting of Mr. Lippolis, Mr. Rothlein, and Ms. Montgomery, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 4 June 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05316-10

    Original file (05316-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Deputy Director Casualty Assistance Branch (N135C) of 30 Aug 10 (3) Subject’s naval record dL... ursuant to the provisions of reference Petitioner, ZZ former spouse of filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the auelicable naval record be corrected to show that Subject submitted a timely written request for conversion from “spouse” to “former spouse” coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) within one year of his...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5092 14

    Original file (NR5092 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he made timely election to change his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) “spouse and child” category of coverage to “former spouse and child” within one year after his divorce on 12 April 2013. The Board, consisting of Ms. Countryman, Mr. Bey, and Mr. Koman reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 November...